Calls For Gene Editing Protections In UK-EU Trade Reset Talks

The UK government has been urged to ensure that progress on gene editing is not compromised as negotiations continue on improving trade relations with the European Union.

Giving evidence to MPs on the Business and Trade Select Committee, NFU president Tom Bradshaw highlighted gene editing as a critical technology where the UK has an opportunity to build global competitiveness if it preserves regulatory freedom. He argued that the country should aim to become a world leader in cutting-edge agricultural innovation and should not “trade away” that advantage in exchange for easier market access.

While acknowledging the benefits of reducing checks and simplifying movement of goods between Great Britain and the EU, Bradshaw cautioned that dynamic alignment with EU rules could restrict the UK’s ability to develop and deploy new technologies. He said border improvements should not limit the country’s long-term capacity to innovate in agricultural technology.

He also suggested that without a carve-out for gene editing, the EU itself could ultimately lose access to UK research progress if it continues to restrict the use of the technology.

The debate comes as the UK considers how far to align with EU food and agricultural regulation as part of a broader “reset” in relations.

Bradshaw told MPs that reducing friction at the border would benefit both sides, highlighting the disruption faced by horticultural businesses importing plant material.

Gene editing has increasingly been positioned as central to building more resilient and sustainable food systems, enabling innovation that supports productivity while reducing environmental impact.

Stakeholders have warned that weakening the UK’s approach could risk stalling investment and research at precisely the moment when the sector needs new solutions most.

Source: Agritech Future